Disclaimer: This is an investigation into documented military and intelligence failures, propaganda operations, and violations of international law—not an attack on any religion, ethnicity, or people.
In the annals of intelligence failures, October 7, 2023 will stand alongside Pearl Harbor and 9/11—not only for its devastation, but for the deliberate inaction that enabled it and the calculated brutality that followed. But unlike those historic shocks, the emerging evidence tells a darker story. Israeli military investigations, media reports, and findings from international bodies suggest this was no failure at all. It was the suppression of actionable intelligence, the dismissal of urgent warnings, and a delayed military response so extreme it demands scrutiny—not of what went wrong, but of what was intended.
Far from being a spontaneous response to an unforeseen attack, Israel’s military campaign appears as the opening act of a long-planned strategy—one that used October 7 as a pretext to activate a blueprint for extermination. The official narrative has been carefully constructed: that Hamas launched a surprise assault, committed atrocities beyond comprehension, and forced Israel to respond with righteous force. But testimonies from Israeli soldiers, leaked documents, and international findings paint a radically different picture—one of calculated negligence, fabricated horror, and systematic war crimes that have turned Gaza into the world’s largest open-air graveyard.
Intelligence Suppression – Turning Warnings into a Pretext for Extermination
Israel’s leaders insist they were blindsided on October 7. Yet Israel’s own investigations and media reports show the opposite: a flood of actionable intelligence was deliberately suppressed because it clashed with a broader strategic agenda.
Between March and July 2023, the Military Intelligence Directorate sent at least four written warnings to Prime Minister Netanyahu. In July, the head of Shin Bet cautioned that “war is coming,” as Israel’s adversaries sensed weakness amid domestic turmoil over judicial reforms. At the same time, Israeli intelligence had obtained Hamas’s entire battle plan—The Walls of Jericho—detailing precisely how fighters would breach the border with paragliders, drones, and rockets. The events of October 7 mirrored that blueprint almost exactly.
Ten days before the attack, Egypt’s intelligence chief Abbas Kamel phoned Netanyahu to warn of “something unusual, a terrible operation.” Netanyahu waved him off, claiming the army was pre-occupied in the West Bank—leaving Egyptian officials incredulous.
On the night of October 6, multiple red flags flashed: Hamas-linked SIM cards were activated en masse; female spotters reported unusual border activity; and rocket movements were detected. Commanders dismissed every signal as mere “training.”
This was not incompetence; it was willful blindness. A female signals-intelligence analyst explicitly wrote, “I utterly refute that the scenario is imaginary.” Her memo was ignored; a colonel brushed her aside.
Subsequent IDF inquiries reveal a deeper rot: surveillance assets were pulled off Hamas ground movements and reassigned to rocket sites; dissent was silenced to preserve careers; and a culture of groupthink buried frontline warnings. What has been branded an “intelligence failure” was, in truth, a failure of leadership, strategy, and will—one that paved the way for the genocidal campaign that followed.
Engineered Collapse – How Israel’s Military Let the Attack Succeed
One of the foundational myths of Israel’s narrative is that its military did everything it could amid the chaos of October 7. But Israeli military investigations expose something far more chilling: a response so lethally delayed and structurally hollow that it appears deliberately engineered to fail—ensuring maximum civilian casualties and creating the political justification for a war of extermination.
The Gaza Division, tasked with frontline defense, had just 700 troops and was overrun within hours. For over five hours—the most critical phase of the assault—it was functionally paralyzed. Reinforcements only began to arrive around noon, by which point commanders had not even realized the division had collapsed.
Across southern Israel, IDF units arrived hours too late. In many kibbutzim, soldiers stood outside while massacres unfolded within. At Nir Oz, survivors reported that Hamas fighters had already fled by the time the IDF finally arrived. The military later admitted these failures were “extremely grave and cannot occur.”
The problem wasn’t just response—it was total absence of preparedness. The IDF had no operational plan for a mass assault. Mobilization protocols assumed a full day’s notice. Soldiers relied on carpools, rideshares, and commandeered school buses. Many sat idle at gas stations and parking lots, mere minutes from slaughter sites, awaiting nonexistent orders.
The command structure itself was catastrophically centralized. Both the Gaza Division HQ and two brigade command centers were located on a single base—one successful strike severed control over the entire region. It took two full days to reassert control over territory long considered impenetrable.
This was not chaos. It was a controlled collapse. The abandonment of Israeli civilians was not a tragic lapse—it was a calculated precondition for the genocidal war that followed.
The Doctrine of Expendability – Sacrificing Civilians for the Narrative
Another central pillar of Israel’s official story is that any Israeli deaths by friendly fire were rare, accidental, and tragically inevitable. But Israeli investigations and firsthand testimony tell a far darker truth: the systematic revival and mass application of the Hannibal Directive—a military policy that authorizes the killing of Israeli citizens to prevent their capture.
Though officially canceled in 2016, the directive was reactivated during the chaos of October 7. Commanders issued broad, unqualified orders: no vehicle was to return to Gaza—regardless of whether it carried Israeli hostages. These weren’t isolated battlefield decisions. They were pre-authorized standing orders.
The consequences were devastating. In Kibbutz Be’eri, Israeli tanks shelled a house known to contain more than a dozen hostages, including 12-year-old twins. Only two survived. UN investigators later confirmed that Israeli forces had likely applied the directive in multiple cases, resulting in at least 14 known civilian deaths.
Former Air Force Colonel Nof Erez described the scale as “a mass Hannibal,” with vehicles flooding the battlefield—some carrying hostages, some not—yet all treated as potential targets. Tank commander Bar Zonshein later admitted, “I decided that this is the right decision—that it’s better to stop the abduction and that they not be taken.”
Meanwhile, the Israeli Air Force, unable or unwilling to distinguish between Hamas fighters and Israeli civilians, shifted its targeting to Gaza-based commanders—leaving besieged Israeli civilians without protection. Internal military reports conceded that friendly fire had killed Israelis—and accepted those deaths as a cost of preserving the national narrative.
This was not the fog of war. It was policy. It was a doctrine of expendability—a system that sacrificed its own people to protect the illusion of control and to justify what would come next.
Manufactured Atrocities – Fabricating Moral License for Genocide
One of the most powerful tools in Israel’s genocidal arsenal was not a weapon, but a narrative: the claim that Hamas committed uniquely savage atrocities so horrific that any level of retaliation—no matter how unlawful—was justified. This was not a spontaneous reaction to chaos. It was a coordinated propaganda campaign, carefully engineered to shock the conscience, disable critical scrutiny, and manufacture consent for mass slaughter.
Israeli officials, media outlets, and allied spokespeople relied on fabricated stories, discredited witnesses, and manipulated imagery to craft a story of inhuman barbarism. These emotional weapons created a moral absolutism in which Israel’s response—no matter how indiscriminate, disproportionate, or illegal—could be defended as righteous vengeance.
In the aftermath, the truth was secondary. What mattered was that public outrage had been activated and disbelief suspended—creating the psychological conditions necessary for genocide to proceed under the guise of justice.
The Orchestrated Fabrication of Atrocities
One of the most inflammatory lies in the early days of the October 7 narrative was the now-infamous claim that Hamas had beheaded 40 babies. The story spread globally within hours, amplified by headlines, influencers, and state officials. Yet it was entirely false. Israeli authorities later admitted there were no beheadings, and Israeli media confirmed that only one baby—Mila Cohen—was killed that day, shot while being held in her mother’s arms.
Other grotesque claims followed. The story of a baby burned alive in an oven was debunked by Haaretz, which reviewed testimonies and found no evidence to support it. Allegations that babies had been “hung on clotheslines” were also discredited, with IDF spokespeople acknowledging that the soldiers who spread these accounts had “misspoken” and were not authorized to speak on behalf of the military.
These were not innocent errors or wartime rumors. They were deliberately crafted emotional triggers, designed to short-circuit rational scrutiny, inflame public rage, and morally authorize the collective punishment that was already underway.
The ZAKA Scandal: Turning Corpses into Fundraising Props
The calculated nature of Israel’s atrocity propaganda campaign is nowhere clearer than in the actions of ZAKA, the Israeli volunteer rescue organization that became a primary source for many of the most gruesome October 7 claims. Publicly posing as a neutral humanitarian responder, ZAKA was in fact engaged in a coordinated public relations operation—filming promotional videos at massacre sites, fabricating horror stories, and mishandling bodies to create emotionally charged visuals designed to drive donations.
ZAKA volunteers delivered tearful interviews describing unspeakable atrocities—pregnant women with fetuses cut from their bodies, babies burned in ovens. Yet a senior ZAKA official later admitted the group knew these incidents never happened. Israeli media investigations confirmed that ZAKA had transformed massacre scenes into “war rooms for donations,” using corpses as visual props while spreading stories they knew to be false.
The financial motives behind this campaign were exposed in internal audits. Tens of millions of shekels in donations went missing. In 2023 alone, the U.S.-based Friends of ZAKA raised $13 million, but only $9 million was reported as reaching the Israeli branch—raising serious concerns about profiteering, transparency, and the commodification of atrocity in service of both propaganda and profit.
The Comprehensive Debunking of Sexual Violence Claims
While isolated acts of sexual violence may have occurred during the October 7 attacks, there is no credible evidence that such acts were widespread or systematically ordered by Hamas leadership. An in-depth investigation by Al Jazeera’s Investigative Unit concluded that the allegations remain unproven, noting that claims of systematic rape would require “a lot more evidence than has come to light to date.” Similarly, the UN Commission of Inquiry found “no credible evidence” that Palestinian militants were instructed to commit sexual violence—and determined that some of the most widely publicized accounts were demonstrably false.
Two of the most gruesome stories, both promoted by ZAKA volunteers, were later exposed as fabrications. In one case, a volunteer claimed a pregnant woman had been found with her fetus cut from her body. But after cross-referencing with IDF contacts, ZAKA acknowledged that the body had been moved by soldiers during a search for explosives—there was no mutilation.
These false claims, broadcast uncritically by major media outlets, were not harmless rumors. They became central to the emotional architecture of consent—weaponized to inflame public rage, suppress critical scrutiny, and justify a campaign of retaliation that would go on to kill tens of thousands.
Government Coordination of Propaganda
The propaganda campaign that followed October 7 was not the result of confusion or emotion—it was a state-coordinated operation, managed from the highest levels of the Israeli government. Prime Minister Netanyahu publicly praised ZAKA for its role in “influencing public opinion,” as his administration mobilized global sympathy to secure political cover for its military escalation. The director of Israel’s Government Press Office was even more explicit: “It is difficult to imagine the Israeli hasbara with foreign correspondents without the remarkable, valuable, and effective role of ZAKA’s men.”
Major international media outlets became conduits for this state-crafted narrative. A widely circulated CNN report alleging sexual violence relied heavily on unvetted witnesses—many with undisclosed ties to Israeli authorities. Subsequent scrutiny revealed that every “expert” or witness featured in the segment either lacked credibility, had documented ties to the Israeli government, or both. What emerged was a narrative built not on forensic evidence or journalistic integrity, but on emotional manipulation and state-sponsored disinformation.
This was not mere propaganda. It was part of a broader psychological and political architecture of genocide. As history has repeatedly shown, mass extermination requires more than military power—it requires a moral alibi. It requires the systematic dehumanization of the targeted population: to portray them not as victims, but as monsters, animals, or threats, so that their extermination can be framed not as murder—but as justice.
Legal Erosion – Dismantling the Global Framework to Enable Genocide
One of the most dangerous narratives sustaining Israel’s campaign is the claim that its military actions—however tragic—constitute lawful self-defense. But the evidence tells a different story: this is not a war bound by international norms. It is a calculated effort to dismantle the very foundation of international law, removing all legal constraints on state violence.
In open defiance of global conventions, Israel has systematically violated the rules of war established after World War II: bombing hospitals and schools, starving civilians, targeting journalists and aid workers, and rejecting binding rulings from the International Court of Justice. This is not quiet disregard—it is performative contempt. The institutions of international law have been treated not as boundaries, but as targets—to be broken in public as a warning to the world.
This is not self-defense. It is the strategic demolition of the global legal order—the system built to ensure that genocide could never happen again.
Theatrical Contempt at the United Nations
In May 2024, Israeli Ambassador Gilad Erdan staged a performance on the floor of the UN General Assembly—tearing apart a copy of the UN Charter and declaring the United Nations a “terror organization.” Days later, Prime Minister Netanyahu echoed the sentiment, denouncing the UN as a “swamp of antisemitic bile” and a “house of darkness.” Israel then escalated further—declaring UN Secretary-General António Guterres persona non grata and banning him from the country entirely.
This wasn’t just rhetoric. The Israeli Knesset voted to designate UNRWA—the UN agency providing humanitarian relief to Palestinian refugees—a “terrorist organization.” Israeli airstrikes then leveled UNRWA’s headquarters in Gaza City, an act the agency’s commissioner called a “blatant war crime.” In Lebanon, Israel accused UN peacekeepers of acting as “human shields for Hezbollah,” part of a broader campaign to delegitimize any international body capable of imposing legal or moral accountability.
These are not isolated outbursts. They are calculated attacks on the infrastructure of international law—acts of theatrical defiance designed to erase the idea that Israel should be subject to any authority beyond itself.
Complete Rejection of International Court of Justice Orders
On January 26, 2024, the International Court of Justice ruled it “plausible” that Israel was committing genocide in Gaza and issued binding provisional measures: prevent further genocidal acts, allow humanitarian aid, and preserve evidence. Israel responded with contempt. In the weeks that followed, the number of aid trucks entering Gaza actually declined. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International confirmed that Israel continued to violate its obligations as the occupying power—denying food, water, medicine, and safety to millions.
Then, on July 19, 2024, the ICJ issued a second landmark ruling, declaring all Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank and East Jerusalem illegal under international law. The court ordered Israel to end the occupation “as rapidly as possible” and evacuate all settlers. The UN General Assembly reinforced the order in September, with a vote of 124 to 14 demanding compliance within 12 months.
Israel’s response was not negotiation or delay—it was defiance. Settlement construction accelerated.
These rulings represent the most forceful legal condemnations of Israel’s conduct in modern history. The international legal system spoke. Israel tore up the verdict—and broke ground on more settlements.
Decades of UN Resolution Violations
Since 1948, the UN Security Council has adopted 79 resolutions addressing the Arab-Israeli conflict. Israel has systematically violated nearly all of them. By 2008, the BBC reported that every government in the world—except Israel—recognized its settlement activity as illegal under international law. That global consensus was reaffirmed in UN Security Council Resolution 2334 (2016), which declared that Israeli settlements constituted a “flagrant violation” of international law.
Israel responded as it always has—with escalation. Construction expanded. Settler violence intensified. The resolution was ignored in its entirety.
Israeli settlement policy directly violates core principles of international humanitarian law. Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention prohibits an occupying power from transferring parts of its civilian population into occupied territory. The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court classifies such transfers—and the land appropriation they require—as war crimes.
This is not a gray area. It is codified criminality under the very legal frameworks created in the aftermath of World War II to prevent the repetition of ethnic cleansing, apartheid, and population transfer. And yet for decades, Israel has continued these practices with impunity, relying on global inaction to normalize permanent violation.
The Apartheid System
In a landmark 213-page report, Human Rights Watch concluded that Israeli authorities are committing the crimes of apartheid and persecution. The report found that from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea, Israel exercises unified control over the land while systematically privileging Jewish Israelis and repressing Palestinians through policies of segregation, land expropriation, restricted movement, and legal dualism.
The International Court of Justice reached a similar conclusion, affirming that Israel’s legal structure and enforcement mechanisms constitute institutionalized discrimination based on race, religion, and ethnic origin. The court described a system of “near-complete separation” between Israeli settlers and Palestinian residents—engineered, legislated, and violently enforced by the state.
This is not an internal policy dispute. It is a textbook system of apartheid—an international crime in its own right, and a structural foundation for the broader project of displacement, dehumanization, and mass violence.
Extermination as Policy, Not Defense
The final pillar of this campaign of deception is the claim that Israel’s military campaign—despite its devastating civilian toll—constitutes a proportionate and justified response to the threat posed by Hamas. In reality, the evidence reveals a calculated campaign of extermination, not containment. This is not collateral damage—it is deliberate policy.
The result is the worst humanitarian catastrophe of the 21st century. Entire cities have been flattened. Food and water have been weaponized. Medical systems have collapsed. Over 52,000 Palestinians have been killed, and millions displaced, starved, or maimed.
International bodies, legal experts, and human rights organizations have stopped using euphemisms. What is unfolding in Gaza is genocide—in real time, in full view of the world.
The Scale of Orchestrated Slaughter
By October 2024, the United Nations reported that 1.9 million people—over 90% of Gaza’s 2.2 million residents—had been forcibly displaced. This was not incidental. Israel’s actions were designed to create mass, permanent displacement: the erasure of a civilian population from its own land.
More than 52,000 people have been killed in Gaza, and at least 118,000 wounded. Entire families have been wiped out. Homes, hospitals, and schools have been leveled. By mid-January 2024, at least 10,000 children had been confirmed killed—thousands more remain buried beneath the rubble.
Save the Children described the nightmare these children face: “unspeakable horrors, including life-changing injuries, burns, disease, inadequate medical care, and the loss of their parents and other loved ones.” Gaza’s children are not collateral—they are the targets of a system designed to break a people.
The Weaponization of Starvation
Israel has turned Gaza into a starvation experiment—deliberately weaponizing hunger against an entire population. Nearly 2.1 million people are enduring prolonged food shortages, and nearly half a million face imminent starvation. UN experts have declared that “famine has spread across the entire Gaza Strip,” making this one of the worst hunger crises of the 21st century. At least 58 Palestinians have died from malnutrition (including children, the elderly, and the ill) during the full blockade since March 2, 2025.
Israeli Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich openly endorsed this campaign. On August 5, 2024, he stated that blocking humanitarian aid to Gaza is “justified and moral,” even if it causes two million Gazans to starve to death. UN experts have since described Israel’s blockade as a “targeted starvation campaign” deliberately engineered to kill civilians—especially children.
The IPC Famine Review Committee warned that famine in northern Gaza was imminent, with 70% of the population already enduring catastrophic conditions. Overall, more than half of Gaza’s population—1.11 million people—is expected to reach the same threshold. Meanwhile, Israeli restrictions have limited the World Food Programme to delivering fewer than 1,600 calories per person per day, far below the minimum survival threshold of 2,100.
This is not a humanitarian failure. It is a siege—a campaign of engineered mass suffering, carried out in defiance of every legal and moral norm.
The Destruction of Civilian Infrastructure
Seventy percent of Gaza’s critical water infrastructure has been damaged or destroyed, leaving much of the population without safe drinking water. Dehydration is rampant, especially among children, who are the most vulnerable. Israel’s attacks have targeted or destroyed essential civilian infrastructure across the board—including hospitals, schools, power grids, water systems, bakeries, and farmland—resources explicitly protected under international humanitarian law.
Since the collapse of the ceasefire in March 2025, nearly 50 child protection centers have been forced to shut down, cutting off services to at least 40,000 children. The ongoing fuel blockade has pushed Gaza’s last remaining life-support systems—ambulances, incubators, water pumps—to the brink of total collapse. No shelter supplies have entered Gaza since the beginning of the siege, leaving millions exposed to the elements.
These are not side effects of war. They are deliberate tactics of destruction—systematically dismantling every structure required to sustain civilian life.
International Recognition of Genocide
“We do not need to wait for a declaration of famine in Gaza to know that people are already starving, sick, and dying,” warned the Director-General of the World Health Organization. “Food and medicine are minutes away—just across the border.” The UN High Commissioner for Human Rights echoed this reality: “Palestinians have been presented the grimmest of choices—die from starvation or risk being killed while trying to access the meagre food made available through Israel’s militarized humanitarian assistance mechanism.”
UN experts went further, declaring that Israel’s “intentional and targeted starvation campaign against the Palestinian people is a form of genocidal violence,” and that it has resulted in famine across all of Gaza. The speed and severity of the collapse in Gaza’s nutritional status was described as “unprecedented globally”—a manufactured famine executed with devastating efficiency.
Conclusion: The Architecture of Genocide
What we are witnessing is not a war—it is the systematic extermination of a captive population. The October 7 attack was not an intelligence failure but a strategic green light: warnings were ignored, soldiers abandoned, and responses delayed to manufacture a pretext for a long-planned campaign of ethnic cleansing.
Fabricated atrocities flooded the media to justify annihilation. The Hannibal Directive was invoked to kill Israeli civilians rather than let them be taken alive. Entire families were wiped out while the world was fed a lie.
Israel’s leadership used October 7 to activate a genocidal strategy. Hospitals, schools, and shelters have become deliberate targets. Over 52,000 Palestinians are dead, half a million face starvation, and Gaza as a functioning society has been razed. UN experts have called it genocidal violence. This is not collateral damage—it is policy.
The institutions meant to uphold law and truth—governments, media, international bodies—have been hijacked or silenced. What remains is a livestreamed genocide, enabled by a corrupted global order and powered by Palestinian blood.
This was never about defense. The intelligence failures were intentional. The delays were deliberate. The lawbreaking is the objective. The only question left is whether the world will act to stop this machinery—or allow it to finish its work.
References
[1] Common Dreams: “Stop Netanyahu Before He Gets Us All Killed”
[2] War on the Rocks: “Israel’s Oct. 7 Early Warning Failure: Who Is to Blame?”
[3] The Cipher Brief: “One Year Later, Lessons from Israel’s October 7 Intelligence Failures”
[4] The Conversation: “Why Israel’s intelligence chiefs failed to listen to October 7 warnings”
[6] New Lines Magazine: “How Changes in the Israeli Military Led to the Failure of October 7”
[7] Times of Israel: “IDF identified but ignored 5 warning signs of Hamas attack on eve of Oct. 7”
[8] Al Jazeera: “What does the report into Israeli military failures on October 7 say?”
[9] VOA News: “Israeli army acknowledges Oct. 7 failures, including slow response”
[10] Times of Israel: “IDF had no plan for responding to a Hamas attack of October 7’s magnitude”
[11] Al Jazeera: “Why did Israel deploy Hannibal Directive, allowing killing of own citizens?”
[12] Haaretz: “IDF Ordered Hannibal Directive on October 7 to Prevent Hamas Taking Soldiers Captive”
[13] Times of Israel: “IDF officers invoked defunct ‘Hannibal Protocol’ during Oct. 7 fighting”
[14] Al Jazeera: “October 7: Forensic analysis shows Hamas abuses, many false Israeli claims”
[16] TRT World: “October 7 ‘rape claims’ debunked as Israeli propaganda unravels”
[17] NBC News: “Unverified reports of ‘40 babies beheaded’ in Israel-Hamas war inflame social media”
[18] Soch Fact Check: “Media consensus reveals no evidence of Israeli baby burned in oven by Hamas”
[19] Times of Israel: “ZAKA exploited Hamas’s October 7 attack to campaign for donations”
[21] Times of Israel: “Report: Millions of shekels of post-October 7 donations to ZAKA have gone missing”
[22] Mondoweiss: “ZAKA is not a trustworthy source for allegations of sexual violence on October 7”
[23] Mondoweiss: “Here’s what Pramila Patten’s UN report on Oct 7 sexual violence actually said”
[24] Mondoweiss: “CNN report claiming sexual violence on October 7 relied on non-credible witnesses”
[25] CNN: “Israeli ambassador shreds UN document in angry speech”
[27] International Bar Association: “Israel on collision course with the United Nations”
[28] Human Rights Watch: “Israel Not Complying with World Court Order in Genocide Case”
[30] NPR: “ICJ says it’s ‘plausible’ Israel committed genocide in Gaza”
[31] International Court of Justice: “Summary of the Order of 26 January 2024”
[32] Amnesty International: “Chapter 3: Israeli Settlements and International Law”
[33] NBC News: “Israeli settlements violate international law, U.N.’s top court says”
[34] International Court of Justice: “Summary of the Advisory Opinion of 19 July 2024”
Comments